A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USING CODE SWITCHING AND CODE MIXING METHOD ON ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY AT SMK TUNAS PELITA

Authors

  • Nudya Yultisa
  • Efrini Panjaitan
  • Muftia salsabila Nasution

Keywords:

Code Switching, Code Mixing, Speaking

Abstract

The aim of this research 1) to explore the type of each method that frequently usedby the eleventh-grade students of SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai, 2) to identify which method ismore often used by the eleventh-grade students of SMK Tunas Pelita Binjai. Data wereanalysed using descriptive qualitative methods. Data were obtained from speaking testsadministered to students in group in front of the class. The types of code-switching, namelyTag-switching, Inter-sentential, and Intra-sentential, were analysed based on Appel and Muysken theory. As a result, students frequently used Intra-sentential type of code-switching at a rate of 72%, Inter-sentential at a rate of 40,4%, and finally used Tag-switching at a rate of 0%. Types of code-mixing, namely Insertion, Alternation and Congruent Lexicalization, were analysed based on Muysken theory. The results showedthat 70,2% of the students frequently used the Insertion type of code-mixing, while the rateof the Alternation was 21,2%, and the rate of Congruent Lexicalization was 0%. Above all,the results showed the students used code-switching more frequently during theconversation test with total 112,4%, while the code-mixing showed the total 91,4%.

References

Appel, R., & Muysken, P. 2006.

Language contact and

bilingualism. Amsterdam:

Amsterdam University Press.

Creswell, John & Guetterman,

Timothy. 2018. Educational

Research: Planning,

Conducting, and Evaluating

Quantitative and Qualitative

Research, 6th Edition. New

York: Pearson.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice

of English Language Teaching.

London: Longman.

Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to

Sociolinguistics. London:

Pearson Education Limited.

Muysken, P., Díaz, C. P., & Muysken,

P. C. 2000. Bilingual speech: A

typology of code-mixing.

Cambridge University Press.

Nilep, C. 2010. "Code Switching" in

Sociocultural Linguistics.

Colorado Research in

Linguistics.

Panjaitan, Efrini., et al. 2021. The

Effect of Using Small Group

Discussion Method on

Students’ Ability in Reading

CODE MIXINGCongruent

Alternation Lexicalization

Insertion

Comprehension for the

Eleventh Grade Students of

SMA Taman Siswa Binjai.

Binjai: Jurnal Serunai Bahasa

Inggris STKIP Budidaya

Binjai.

Sugiyono. 2006. Statistika untuk

Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Verplaetse, L.S., & Schmitt E. 2010.

Bilingualism and Learning.

Southern Connecticut State

University, New Haven, CT,

USA.

Yuliana, N., et al. 2015. Code-Mixing

and Code-Switching of

Indonesian Celebrities: a

Comparative Study. Jakarta

Selatan.

Yultisa, Nudia & Ihsani Diah

Anjariah. 2018. The Effect of

Code Mixing Technique on

Students’ Speaking Ability of

Tenth Grade Students of SMK

Tunas Pelita Binjai atAcademic

Year 2018/2019. English

Education Department, STKIP

Budidaya Binjai.

Published

2025-12-22